The results of § 69 enable us to give an alternative proof of the important theorem proved in § 19.

If we divide PQ into two equal parts, one at least of them must contain infinitely many points of S. We select the one which does, or, if both do, we select the left-hand half; and we denote the selected half by P1Q1 (Fig. 28). If P1Q1 is the left-hand half, P1 is the same point as P.

Similarly, if we divide P1Q1 into two halves, one at least of them must contain infinitely many points of S. We select the half P2Q2 which does so, or, if both do so, we select the left-hand half. Proceeding in this way we can define a sequence of intervals PQ,P1Q1,P2Q2,P3Q3, , each of which is a half of its predecessor, and each of which contains infinitely many points of S.

The points P, P1, P2, … progress steadily from left to right, and so Pn tends to a limiting position T. Similarly Qn tends to a limiting position T. But TT is plainly less than PnQn, whatever the value of n; and PnQn, being equal to PQ/2n, tends to zero. Hence T coincides with T, and Pn and Qn both tend to T.

Then T is a point of accumulation of S. For suppose that ξ is its coordinate, and consider any interval of the type [ξϵ,ξ+ϵ]. If n is sufficiently large, PnQn will lie entirely inside this interval.1 Hence [ξϵ,ξ+ϵ] contains infinitely many points of S.


  1. This will certainly be the case as soon as PQ/2n<ϵ.↩︎

69-70. Steadily increasing or decreasing functions Main Page 72. The limit of xn