1. What are the conditions that , (1) for all values of , , ; (2) for all values of , , subject to ; (3) for all values of , , subject to both and ?
2. Any positive rational number can be expressed in one and only one way in the form where , , …, are integers, and
3. Any positive rational number can be expressed in one and one way only as a simple continued fraction where , are positive integers, of which the first only may be zero.
[Accounts of the theory of such continued fractions will be found in text-books of algebra. For further information as to modes of representation of rational and irrational numbers, see Hobson,
Theory of Functions of a Real Variable, pp. 45–49.]
4. Find the rational roots (if any) of .
5. A line is divided at in aurea sectione (Euc. ii. 11)— so that . Show that the ratio is irrational.
[A direct geometrical proof will be found in Bromwich’s
Infinite Series, § 143, p. 363.]
6. is irrational. In what circumstances can , where , , , are rational, be rational?
7. Some elementary inequalities. In what follows , denote positive numbers (including zero) and , positive integers. Since and have the same sign, we have , or an inequality which may also be written in the form By repeated application of this formula we obtain and in particular When in , or in , the inequalities are merely different forms of the inequality , which expresses the fact that the arithmetic mean of two positive numbers is not less than their geometric mean.
8. Generalisations for numbers. If we write down the inequalities of the type (1) which can be formed with numbers , , …, , and add the results, we obtain the inequality or Hence we can deduce an obvious extension of which the reader may formulate for himself, and in particular the inequality
9. The general form of the theorem concerning the arithmetic and geometric means. An inequality of a slightly different character is that which asserts that the arithmetic mean of , , …, is not less than their geometric mean. Suppose that and are the greatest and least of the ’s (if there are several greatest or least ’s we may choose any of them indifferently), and let be their geometric mean. We may suppose , as the truth of the proposition is obvious when . If now we replace and by we do not alter the value of the geometric mean; and, since we certainly do not increase the arithmetic mean.
It is clear that we may repeat this argument until we have replaced each of , , …, by ; at most repetitions will be necessary. As the final value of the arithmetic mean is , the initial value cannot have been less.
10. Schwarz’s inequality. Suppose that , , …, and , , …, are any two sets of numbers positive or negative. It is easy to verify the identity where and assume the values , , …, . It follows that an inequality usually known as Schwarz’s (though due originally to Cauchy).
11. If , , …, are all positive, and , then
12. If , , …, and , , …, are two sets of positive numbers, arranged in descending order of magnitude, then
13. If , , , … and , , , … are two sets of numbers, and all of the first set are positive, then lies between the algebraically least and greatest of , , …, .
14. If , are dissimilar surds, and , where , , , are rational, then , , , .
[Express
in the form
, where
and
are rational, and apply the theorem of
§ 14.]
15. Show that if , where , , are rational numbers, then , , .
16. Any polynomial in and , with rational coefficients ( any sum of a finite number of terms of the form , where and are integers, and rational), can be expressed in the form where , , , are rational.
17. Express , where , , etc. are rational, in the form where , , , are rational.
[Evidently
where
,
, etc. are rational numbers which can easily be found. The required reduction may now be easily completed by multiplication of numerator and denominator by
. For example, prove that
18. If , , , are rational numbers such that then either (i) , or (ii) and are squares of rational numbers.
19. If all the values of and given by (where , , , , , are rational) are rational, then are both squares of rational numbers.
20. Show that and are cubic functions of , with rational coefficients, and that is the ratio of two linear functions of .
21. The expression is equal to if , and to if .
22. Show that any polynomial in , with rational coefficients, can be expressed in the form where , , are rational.
More generally, if is any rational number, any polynomial in with rational coefficients can be expressed in the form where , are rational and . For any such polynomial is of the form where the ’s are rational. If , this is already of the form required. If , let be any power of higher than the th. Then , where is an integer and ; and . Hence we can get rid of all powers of higher than the th.
23. Express and in the form , where , , are rational. [Multiply numerator and denominator of the second expression by .]
24. If where , , are rational, then , , .
[Let
. Then
and
Hence
or
Multiplying these two quadratic equations by and and subtracting, we obtain , or , a rational number, which is impossible. The only alternative is that , .
Hence , . If neither nor is zero, we can divide the second equation by the first, which gives : and this is impossible, since cannot be equal to the rational number . Hence , , and it follows from the original equation that , , and are all zero.
As a corollary, if , then , , .
It may be proved, more generally, that if not being a perfect th power, then ; but the proof is less simple.]
25. If , then either , , or and are both cubes of rational numbers.
26. If , then either one of , , is zero, and the other two equal and opposite, or , , are rational multiples of the same surd .
27. Find rational numbers , such that
28. If , then is rational. [Each of the numbers under a cube root is of the form where and are rational.]
29. If , any polynomial in is the root of an equation of degree , with rational coefficients.
[We can express the polynomial (
say) in the form
where
,
are rational, as in Ex. 22.
Similarly
Hence where is the determinant and , the minors of , .]
30. Apply this process to , and deduce the theorem of § 14.
31. Show that satisfies the equation
32. Algebraical numbers. We have seen that some irrational numbers (such as ) are roots of equations of the type where , , …, are integers. Such irrational numbers are called algebraical numbers: all other irrational numbers, such as (§ 15), are called transcendental numbers. Show that if is an algebraical number, then so are , where is any rational number, and , where and are any integers.
33. If and are algebraical numbers, then so are , , and .
[We have equations
where the
’s and
’s are integers. Write
,
in the second, and eliminate
. We thus get an equation of similar form
satisfied by
. Similarly for the other cases.]
34. If where , , …, are any algebraical numbers, then is an algebraical number. [We have equations of the type in which the coefficients , are integers Eliminate , …, between these and the original equation for .]
35. Apply this process to the equation .
[The result is
.]
36. Find equations, with rational coefficients, satisfied by
37. If , then , where
38. If and , then satisfies a quadratic equation with rational coefficients.
[It will be found that
.]