13. Quadratic surds.
A number of the form , where is a positive rational number which is not the square of another rational number, is called a pure quadratic surd. A number of the form , where is rational, and is a pure quadratic surd, is sometimes called a mixed quadratic surd.
The two numbers are the roots of the quadratic equation Conversely, the equation , where and are rational, and , has as its roots the two quadratic surds .
The only kind of irrational numbers whose existence was suggested by the geometrical considerations of § 3 are these quadratic surds, pure and mixed, and the more complicated irrationals which may be expressed in a form involving the repeated extraction of square roots, such as
It is easy to construct geometrically a line whose length is equal to any number of this form, as the reader will easily see for himself. That irrational numbers of these kinds only can be constructed by Euclidean methods ( by geometrical constructions with ruler and compasses) is a point the proof of which must be deferred for the present. This property of quadratic surds makes them especially interesting.
Example VII
1. Give geometrical constructions for
2. The quadratic equation has two real roots if . Suppose , , rational. Nothing is lost by taking all three to be integers, for we can multiply the equation by the least common multiple of their denominators.
The reader will remember that the roots are . It is easy to construct these lengths geometrically, first constructing . A much more elegant, though less straightforward, construction is the following.
Draw a circle of unit radius, a diameter , and the tangents at the ends of the diameters.

Take and , having regard to sign. Join , cutting the circle in and . Draw and , cutting in and . Then and are the roots of the equation with their proper signs.
The proof is simple and we leave it as an exercise to the reader. Another, perhaps even simpler, construction is the following.
Take a line of unit length. Draw perpendicular to , and perpendicular to and in the same direction as . On as diameter describe a circle cutting in and . Then and are the roots.
3. If is positive and will be drawn in the same direction. Verify that will not meet the circle if , while if it will be a tangent. Verify also that if the circle in the second construction will touch .
4. Prove that
14. Some theorems concerning quadratic surds.
Two pure quadratic surds are said to be similar if they can be expressed as rational multiples of the same surd, and otherwise to be dissimilar. Thus and so , are similar surds. On the other hand, if and are integers which have no common factor, and neither of which is a perfect square, and are dissimilar surds. For suppose, if possible, where all the letters denote integers.
Then is evidently rational, and therefore (Ex. II. 3) integral. Thus , where is an integer. Let , , be the prime factors of , so that where , , are positive integers. Then is divisible by , and therefore either (1) is divisible by , or (2) is divisible by , or (3) and are both divisible by . The last case may be ruled out, since and have no common factor. This argument may be applied to each of the factors , , , so that must be divisible by some of these factors and by the remainder. Thus where denotes the product of some of the factors , , and the product of the rest. Hence and are both perfect squares, which is contrary to our hypothesis.
If , , , are rational and then either , or and are both squares of rational numbers.
For is rational, and so is If is not equal to (in which case it is obvious that is also equal to ), it follows that is also rational. Hence and are rational.
If , then .
Example VIII
1. Prove ab initio that and are not similar surds.
2. Prove that and , where is rational, are similar surds (unless both are rational).
3. If and are rational, then cannot be rational unless and are rational. The same is true of , unless .
4. If then either (a) and , or (b) and , or (c) , , , are all rational or all similar surds. [Square the given equation and apply the theorem above.]
5. Neither nor can be rational unless is rational.
6. Prove that if , where and are rational, then , where is any integer, can be expressed in the form , where and are rational. For example, Deduce that any polynomial in with rational coefficients ( any expression of the form where , … are rational numbers) can be expressed in the form .
7. If , where is not a perfect square, is the root of an algebraical equation with rational coefficients, then is another root of the same equation.
8. Express in the form prescribed in Ex. 6. [Multiply numerator and denominator by .]
9. Deduce from Exs. 6 and 8 that any expression of the form , where and are polynomials in with rational coefficients, can be expressed in the form , where and are rational.
10. If , , and are positive, we can express in the form , where
11. Determine the conditions that it may be possible to express , where and are rational, in the form , where and are rational.
12. If is positive, the necessary and sufficient conditions that should be rational are that and should both be squares of rational numbers.