1.Rational Numbers

A fraction r=p/q, where p and q are positive or negative integers, is called a rational number. We can suppose (i) that p and q have no common factor, as if they have a common factor we can divide each of them by it, and (ii) that q is positive, since p/(q)=(p)/q,(p)/(q)=p/q. To the rational numbers thus defined we may add the ‘rational number 0’ obtained by taking p=0.

We assume that the reader is familiar with the ordinary arithmetical rules for the manipulation of rational numbers. The examples which follow demand no knowledge beyond this.

Example I

1. If r and s are rational numbers, then r+s, rs, rs, and r/s are rational numbers, unless in the last case s=0 (when r/s is of course meaningless).

2. If λm, and n are positive rational numbers, and m>n, then λ(m2n2), 2λmn, and λ(m2+n2) are positive rational numbers. Hence show how to determine any number of right-angled triangles the lengths of all of whose sides are rational.

3. Any terminated decimal represents a rational number whose denominator contains no factors other than 2 or 5. Conversely, any such rational number can be expressed, and in one way only, as a terminated decimal.

[The general theory of decimals will be considered in Ch. IV.]

4. The positive rational numbers may be arranged in the form of a simple series as follows: 11,21,12,31,22,13,41,32,23,14, .

Show that p/q is the [12(p+q1)(p+q2)+q]th term of the series.

[In this series every rational number is repeated indefinitely. Thus 1 occurs as 1122, 33,. We can of course avoid this by omitting every number which has already occurred in a simpler form, but then the problem of determining the precise position of p/q becomes more complicated.]

 

2. The representation of rational numbers by points on a line.

It is convenient, in many branches of mathematical analysis, to make a good deal of use of geometrical illustrations.

The use of geometrical illustrations in this way does not, of course, imply that analysis has any sort of dependence upon geometry: they are illustrations and nothing more, and are employed merely for the sake of clearness of exposition. This being so, it is not necessary that we should attempt any logical analysis of the ordinary notions of elementary geometry; we may be content to suppose, however far it may be from the truth, that we know what they mean.

Assuming, then, that we know what is meant by a straight line, a segment of a line, and the length of a segment, let us take a straight line Λ, produced indefinitely in both directions, and a segment A0A1 of any length. We call A0 the origin, or the point 0, and A1 the point 1, and we regard these points as representing the numbers 0 and 1.

In order to obtain a point which shall represent a positive rational number r=p/q, we choose the point Ar such that A0Ar/A0A1=r, A0Ar being a stretch of the line extending in the same direction along the line as A0A1, a direction which we shall suppose to be from left to right when, as in Fig. 1, the line is drawn horizontally across the paper.

In order to obtain a point to represent a negative rational number r=s, it is natural to regard length as a magnitude capable of sign, positive if the length is measured in one direction (that of A0A1), and negative if measured in the other, so that AB=BA; and to take as the point representing r the point As such that A0As=AsA0=A0As.

We thus obtain a point Ar on the line corresponding to every rational value of r, positive or negative, and such that A0Ar=rA0A1; and if, as is natural, we take A0A1 as our unit of length, and write A0A1=1, then we have A0Ar=r. We shall call the points Ar the rational points of the line.


Main Page 3-7. Irrational Numbers