47. Roots of complex numbers.
We have not, up to the present, attributed any meaning to symbols such as , , when is a complex number, and and integers. It is, however, natural to adopt the definitions which are given in elementary algebra for real values of . Thus we define or , where is a positive integer, as a number which satisfies the equation ; and , where is an integer, as . These definitions do not prejudge the question as to whether there are or are not more than one (or any) roots of the equation.
48. Solution of the equation .
Let where is positive and is an angle such that . If we put , the equation takes the form so that
The only possible value of is , the ordinary arithmetical th root of ; and in order that the last two equations should be satisfied it is necessary and sufficient that , where is an integer, or If , where and are integers, and , the value of is , and in this the value of is a matter of indifference. Hence the equation has roots and only, given by , where
That these roots are in reality all distinct is easily seen by plotting them on Argand’s diagram. The particular root is called the principal value of .
The case in which , , is of particular interest. The roots of the equation are These numbers are called the th roots of unity; the principal value is unity itself. If we write for , we see that the th roots of unity are
Example XXII
1. The two square roots of are , ; the three cube roots are , , ; the four fourth roots are , , , ; and the five fifth roots are
2. Prove that
3. Prove that
4. The th roots of are the products of the th roots of unity by the principal value of .
5. It follows from Exs. XXI. 14 that the roots of are like or unlike signs being chosen according as is positive or negative. Show that this result agrees with the result of § 48.
6. Show that is equal to
[The factors of
are
The factor
is
. The factors
,
taken together give a factor
.]
7. Resolve , , and into factors in a similar way.
8. Show that is equal to
[Use the formula
and split up each of the last two expressions into
factors.]
9. Find all the roots of the equation .
10. The problem of finding the accurate value of in a numerical form involving square roots only, as in the formula , is the algebraical equivalent of the geometrical problem of inscribing a regular polygon of sides in a circle of unit radius by Euclidean methods, i.e. by ruler and compasses. For this construction will be possible if and only if we can construct lengths measured by and ; and this is possible (Ch. II, Misc. Exs. II 22) if and only if these numbers are expressible in a form involving square roots only.
Euclid gives constructions for , , , , , , , and . It is evident that the construction is possible for any value of which can be found from these by multiplication by any power of . There are other special values of for which such constructions are possible, the most interesting being .
49. The general form of De Moivre’s Theorem.
It follows from the results of the last section that if is a positive integer then one of the values of is Raising each of these expressions to the power (where is any integer positive or negative), we obtain the theorem that one of the values of is , or that if is any rational number then one of the values of is This is a generalised form of De Moivre’s Theorem (SecNo 45).