1. Recurring decimals. The commonest example of an infinite geometric series is given by an ordinary recurring decimal. Consider, for example, the decimal . This stands, according to the ordinary rules of arithmetic, for
The reader should consider where and how any of the general theorems of § 77 have been used in this reduction.
2. Show that in general the denominator containing ’s and ’s.
3. Show that a pure recurring decimal is always equal to a proper fraction whose denominator does not contain or as a factor.
4. A decimal with non-recurring and recurring decimal figures is equal to a proper fraction whose denominator is divisible by or but by no higher power of either.
5. The converses of Exs. 3, 4 are also true. Let , and suppose first that is prime to . If we divide all powers of by we can obtain at most different remainders. It is therefore possible to find two numbers and , where , such that and give the same remainder. Hence is divisible by , and so , where , is divisible by . Hence may be expressed in the form , or in the form i.e. as a pure recurring decimal with figures. If on the other hand , where is prime to , and is the greater of and , then has a denominator prime to , and is therefore expressible as the sum of an integer and a pure recurring decimal. But this is not true of , for any value of less than ; hence the decimal for has exactly non-recurring figures.
6. To the results of Exs. 2–5 we must add that of Ex. I. 3. Finally, if we observe that we see that every terminating decimal can also be expressed as a mixed recurring decimal whose recurring part is composed entirely of ’s. For example, . Thus every proper fraction can be expressed as a recurring decimal, and conversely.
7. Decimals in general. The expression of irrational numbers as non-recurring decimals. Any decimal, whether recurring or not, corresponds to a definite number between and . For the decimal stands for the series Since all the digits are positive, the sum of the first terms of this series increases with , and it is certainly not greater than or . Hence tends to a limit between and .
Moreover no two decimals can correspond to the same number (except in the special case noticed in Ex. 6). For suppose that , are two decimals which agree as far as the figures , , while . Then (unless , , … are all ’s), and so It follows that the expression of a rational fraction as a recurring decimal (Exs. 2–6) is unique. It also follows that every decimal which does not recur represents some irrational number between and . Conversely, any such number can be expressed as such a decimal. For it must lie in one of the intervals If it lies between and , then the first figure is . By subdividing this interval into parts we can determine the second figure; and so on. But (Exs. 3, 4) the decimal cannot recur. Thus, for example, the decimal , obtained by the ordinary process for the extraction of , cannot recur.
8. The decimals and , in which the number of zeros between two ’s or ’s increases by one at each stage, represent irrational numbers.
9. The decimal , in which the th figure is if is prime, and zero otherwise, represents an irrational number. [Since the number of primes is infinite the decimal does not terminate. Nor can it recur: for if it did we could determine and so that , , , , … are all prime numbers; and this is absurd, since the series includes .]