We have learned how to differentiate simple algebraical functions such as or , and we have now to consider how to tackle the sum of two or more functions.
For instance, let what will its be? How are we to go to work on this new job?
The answer to this question is quite simple: just differentiate them, one after the other, thus:
If you have any doubt whether this is right, try a more general case, working it by first principles. And this is the way.
Let , where is any function of , and any other function of . Then, letting increase to , will increase to ; and will increase to ; and to .
And we shall have:
Subtracting the original , we get
and dividing through by , we get:
This justifies the procedure. You differentiate each function separately and add the results. So if now we take the example of the preceding paragraph, and put in the values of the two functions, we shall have, using the notation shown (see chapter 3), exactly as before.
If there were three functions of , which we may call , and , so that
As for subtraction, it follows at once; for if the function had itself had a negative sign, its differential coefficient would also be negative; so that by differentiating
But when we come to do with Products, the thing is not quite so simple.
Suppose we were asked to differentiate the expression what are we to do? The result will certainly not be ; for it is easy to see that neither , nor , would have been taken into that product.
Now there are two ways in which we may go to work.
First way, Do the multiplying first, and, having worked it out, then differentiate.
Accordingly, we multiply together and .
This gives .
Now differentiate, and we get:
Second way, Go back to first principles, and consider the equation where is one function of , and is any other function of . Then, if grows to be ; and to ; and becomes , and becomes , we shall have:
Now is a small quantity of the second order of smallness, and therefore in the limit may be discarded, leaving
Then, subtracting the original , we have left and, dividing through by , we get the result:
This shows that our instructions will be as follows: To differentiate the product of two functions, multiply each function by the differential coefficient of the other, and add together the two products so obtained.
You should note that this process amounts to the following: Treat as constant while you differentiate ; then treat as constant while you differentiate ; and the whole differential coefficient will be the sum of these two treatments.
Now, having found this rule, apply it to the concrete example which was considered above.
We want to differentiate the product
Call ; and .
Then, by the general rule just established, we may write: exactly as before.
Lastly, we have to differentiate quotients.
Think of this example, . In such a case it is no use to try to work out the division beforehand, because will not divide into , neither have they any common factor. So there is nothing for it but to go back to first principles, and find a rule.
So we will put
where and are two different functions of the independent variable . Then, when becomes , will become ; and will become ; and will become . So then
Now perform the algebraic division, thus:
As both these remainders are small quantities of the second order, they may be neglected, and the division may stop here, since any further remainders would be of still smaller magnitudes.
So we have got:
Now subtract the original , and we have left:
This gives us our instructions as to how to differentiate a quotient of two functions. Multiply the divisor function by the differential coefficient of the dividend function; then multiply the dividend function by the differential coefficient of the divisor function; and subtract. Lastly divide by the square of the divisor function.
Going back to our example ,
Write
and
Then
The working out of quotients is often tedious, but there is nothing difficult about it.
Some further examples fully worked out are given hereafter.
Example 1
Differentiate .
Solution
Being a constant, vanishes, and we have
But ; so we get:
Example 2
Differentiate .
Solution
Putting in the index form, we get
Now
Example 3
Differentiate .
Solution
This may be written: .
The vanishes, and we have
Example 4
Differentiate .
Solution
A direct way of doing this will be explained later (see chapter 9); but we can nevertheless manage it now without any difficulty.
Developing the cube, we get hence
Example 5
Differentiate .
Solution
or, more simply, multiply out and then differentiate.
Example 6
Differentiate .
Solution
Same remarks as for preceding example.
Example 7
Differentiate .
Solution
This may be written
This, again, could be obtained more simply by multiplying the two factors first, and differentiating afterwards. This is not, however, always possible; see, for instance, , example 8, in which the rule for differentiating a product must be used.
Example 8
Differentiate .
Example 9
Differentiate .
Example 10
Differentiate .
Solution
In the indexed form, .
hence
Example 12
A reservoir of square cross-section has sides sloping at an angle of with the vertical. The side of the bottom is feet. Find an expression for the quantity pouring in or out when the depth of water varies by foot; hence find, in gallons, the quantity withdrawn hourly when the depth is reduced from to feet in hours.
Solution
The volume of a frustum of pyramid of height , and of bases and , is . It is easily seen that, the slope being , if the depth be , the length of the side of the square surface of the water is feet, so that the volume of water is
cubic feet per foot of depth variation. The mean level from to feet is feet, when , cubic feet.
Gallons per hour corresponding to a change of depth of ft. in hours gallons.
Example 13
The absolute pressure, in atmospheres, , of saturated steam at the temperature C. is given by Dulong as being as long as is above . Find the rate of variation of the pressure with the temperature at C.
Solution
Expand the numerator by the binomial theorem (see chapter 14).
hence
when this becomes atmosphere per degree Centigrade change of temperature.
Exercises III.
(1) Differentiate
(a) .
(2) If , find .
(3) Find the differential coefficient of
(4) Differentiate
(5) If , find .
(6) Differentiate .
Find the differential coefficients of
(11) The temperature of the filament of an incandescent electric lamp is connected to the current passing through the lamp by the relation
Find an expression giving the variation of the current corresponding to a variation of temperature.
(12) The following formulae have been proposed to express the relation between the electric resistance of a wire at the temperature C., and the resistance of that same wire at Centigrade, , , being constants.
Find the rate of variation of the resistance with regard to temperature as given by each of these formulae.
(13) The electromotive-force of a certain type of standard cell has been found to vary with the temperature according to the relation
Find the change of electromotive-force per degree, at , and .
(14) The electromotive-force necessary to maintain an electric arc of length with a current of intensity has been found by Mrs. Ayrton to be where , , , are constants.
Find an expression for the variation of the electromotiveforce (a) with regard to the length of the arc; (b) with regard to the strength of the current.[/su_spoiler]
Answer to Exercises
(1)
(4) .
(11) .
(12) ,, or.
(13) ,,,.
(14) , .