Review on Limit Laws
Let’s review algebraic operations on limits:
Let and be two finite numbers. The following relationships are true as , , , , or
Sum:

Product:

Quotient:

The Indeterminate Forms
Although the theorems tell us a great deal about the behavior of combined functions, there are four cases that the theorems are silent about, specifically the cases in the above tables where there is a question mark in front of. These four cases are denoted by
and are called the indeterminate forms. The value of the indeterminate forms cannot be predicted in advance. Each case may take any value (including , ), or may fail to exist.
Previously, we learned how to evaluate the limits corresponding to the 0/0 form. In this section, we deal with the other three indeterminate forms.
-
In algebra, 0/0 is not defined and infinity is not a number. We should emphasize that 0/0, , and so on are just shorthands for the limits shown in the above tables.
For example, if and , then as . We cannot divide by number 0 because division by zero is not defined. However, we can divide by because although approaches zero as , is never exactly zero unless . So the fraction is defined for , and we can find because in the limit gets closer and closer to 1 but never equal 1. Here we say the limit of as is the indeterminate form of type 0/0:
-
We usually drop the signs when we want to refer to the and indeterminate forms.
-
There are three more indeterminate forms In total, there are 7 indeterminate forms. These three indeterminate forms will be considered in Chapter 6.
Resolving the Indeterminate Forms
Resolving an indeterminate form means finding the limit.
If and are two fractions, find a common denominator, convert them to one indeterminate quotient (often 0/0 or infinity divided by infinity), and then simplify the result.
Solution
When and (that is, , both and approach zero through positive values. So and we have an indeterminate form . When and (or , then both and approach zero through negative values. So and we have again an indeterminate form or .
To evaluate the limit, we find the common denominator. Because [Recall the identity ], we have Here we did not have to consider the one-sided limits ( and ) separately.
Solution
Because
and both and approach infinity and we deal with form (You can investigate that and ). So we convert the given expression into one fraction: Because now we have to evaluate a limit of the form 0/0. There are several ways to evaluate . Probably the easiest way is to use L’Hôpital’s rule that we will learn later. Here are some other ways:
Method a: Divide both the denominator and numerator by and use the following limits that we learned in the section on Theorems for Calculating Limits Therefore
Method b: We can use the half-angle formula (See the section on Trigonomertic Identities): and the double angle formula (See the section on Trigonomertic Identities): Now let . Thus and
Therefore:
Method c: Multiply both the numerator and denominator by and use the identities and :
Limits of Polynomials and Rational Functions as
The end behavior of polynomials is the same as the end behavior of their leading term (= the highest degree term). That is, if then
Read why the above equation is true
Hide the reasoning
To justify these results, let’s factor out the highest power of and then use the fact that for :
With the same reasoning that we used for polynomials, we can say if and , then
and
Show the reasoning
Hide the reasoning
Solution
Notice that and
So we cannot use the Difference Rule and say because is an indeterminate form. We have to subtract the fractions and express the result as a rational function: Thus and
Limits Involving Radicals
Solution
Let’s factor out the highest power of occurring in the denominator and that in the numerator Now recall part 1 of Theorem [[thm:Ch4-Important-Limits-at-Infinity]] that tells us that ( is a rational number). Thus,
Solution
Let’s factor out the highest power of , which is here : Using the facts that (where is a constant), and (where is a rational number), we get
Solution
Let’s factor out the highest power of in the expression under the radical and the highest power of in the denominator. Because
Recall that . Thus
The following figure illustrates the graph of .
 |
Figure: Graph of . It is clear from this graph that . |
Solution
(a) Again we factor out the highest power of the variable inside the radical and the highest power of in the denominator Recall that . So Because when , the values under consideration are positive , Here we have used the fact that as where is a rational number.
(b) For part b, we follow exactly the same steps that we took in part (a), except when , the values under consideration are negative and thus :
The graph of is shown below.
 |
Figure: Graph of . It is clear from this graph that as and as . |
Solution
Similar to the previous examples, we factor out the highest power of inside the radical: Because and , thus and The graph of is shown below.
 |
Figure: Graph of . It is clear from this graph that as . |
Solution
The function looks very similar to the function in the previous example, so we might be tempted to follow the same procedure. Let’s try that out: However, because we will get the indeterminate limit . Fail!
Instead let’s multiply and divide this function by the conjugate of , which is : Recall that . Therefore,
The graph of is shown below.
 |
Figure: Graph of . It is clear from this graph that as . |
Solution
Again factoring out will give the indeterminate limit . Let’s try it out and and . So like the previous example, let’s multiply and divide by the conjugate of the given function.
The graph of is shown below.
 |
Figure: Graph of . It is clear from this graph that as . |
Solution
Notice that As , the values under consideration are negative , thus and and Because the sum of two positive infinitely large quantities is also an infinitely large quantity, then In other words, This is not an indeterminate form.