In this section, we learn a powerful method to attack problems on indeterminate forms, called l’Hôpital’s rule (also written l’Hospital’s rule).
Table of Contents
L’Hôpital’s Rule for the Indeterminate Form 0/0
Assume and are two functions with . Then for , we have Suppose the derivatives and exist and . Because and we get provided that .
Figure 1 visually justifies Equation (i). Figure 1(a) shows the graphs of two differentiable functions and near . If we zoom in toward the point (Figure 1(b)), the graphs of and look almost linear, so we can approximate the ratio of and by the ratio of their local linearizations. That is, because and we have
(a)
(b)
Figure 1
Example 1
Find
Solution 1
Here with Because and by Equation (i), we have
Example 2
Find .
Solution 2
Here and with and . We can use Equation (i) to evaluate the above limit:
Use Equation (i) only when . If this condition is not satisfied, we cannot use this equation.
For example, consider Here and . Because , we cannot use Equation (i). If we use (i), because and , we get . But the correct answer can be obtained simply by subsituting 0 for :
The following theorem generalizes the cases where we can use Equation (i). It states that Equation (i) is true under less stringent conditions and is also valid for one-sided limits as well as limits at and .
Theorem 1.(l’Hôpital’s Rule): Assume and assume also that exists or this limit is or . Then also approaches a limit and Here signifies , or , where .
By the hypothesis that exists, it is tactically assumed there is an open interval containing such that
Both and are differentiable ( and exist) for all in (except possibly for ).
in (except possibly when ).
Show the proof …
Hide the proof
First we prove this theorem for . Because and may not be defined at , we introduce two new functions Both and are continuous at because and similarly .
If and , then and are continuous on and differentiable on (because and ). Therefore, we can apply Cauchy’s Mean-Value Formula to the interval and obtain or for some in the interval .
Because for all in , we have:
(1) ()
(2) , because if , then we would have and by Rolle’s theore, there would be a point between and such that .
Therefore, we divide both sides of (*) by and and obtain Now if we let , then (because ), so The method needs some minor modifications to show that the result is valid as . The combination of these two one-sided limit cases proves that the theorem is true as .
When , the substitution reduces the limit to evaluation of the limit as . Thus Applying l’Hôpital’s rule:
Notice that is the derivative of the numerator divided by the derivative of the denominator and it is different from the derivative of the fraction .
If we apply l’Hôpital’s rule to the well-known limit , we obtain Although we could obtain this limit easily, to derive the formula , we assumed the truth of this limit.
To apply l’Hôpital’s rule:
Make sure the limit of assumes the form 0/0 as .
Differentiate and separately.
Find the limit of as . If the limit is a number, , or , then it is equal to the limit of ; otherwise, we CANNOT conclude that the limit of does not exist.
If necessary, we may repeat the above process. Stop differentiating as soon as the derivative of the numerator or that of the denominator is different from zero.
Example 3
Find
Solution 3
Because we can apply l’Hôpital’s rule Because we apply l’Hôpital’s rule again
It is a common error to apply l’Hôpital’s rule to calculate the limit of as . Applying l’Hôpital’s rule leads to a wrong value because this limit is not indeterminate and can be simply obtained by substituting 1 for .
Example 4
Find
Solution 4
Because we apply l’Hôpital’s rule:
Example 5
Find
Solution 5
Note that here we have an indeterminate limit of type 0/0. So For the last step, we could use l’Hôpital’s rule again.
Example 6
Find
Solution 6
Here we have an indeterminate limit of type . So
Although the second limit is also indeterminate and we can apply l’Hôpital’s rule again, it is easier to directly evaluate the second limit: Therefore:
Example 7
Find
Solution 7
Because we can apply l’Hôpital’s rule:
Example 8
Find
Solution 8
Because we can use l’Hôpital’s rule
Example 9
Find
Solution 9
Because and we have an indeterminate limit of type and we can apply l’Hôpital’s rule . Recall that Thus, The second limit is still 0/0. Thus we can apply l’Hôpital’s rule again. To differentiate the numerator, it might be easier to write it as Therefore,
Example 10
Find
Solution 10
Because and we have an indeterminate limit of type . Thus Because we obtain
Example 11
Find
Solution 11
Because and we have an indeterminate limit of type . So l’Hôpital’s rule applies:
Example 12
Evaluate
Solution 12
Because and are continuous functions, we have and So we have an indeterminate limit of type 0/0, and l’Hôpital’s rule applies:
Again note that if as , but does not approach a limit (that is, it is not a finite number, , or ), we cannot conclude that does not approach a limit. The next example shows such a situation.
Example 13
Can we apply l’Hôpital’s rule to find if and ?
Solution 13
In this example, [Because , we have , and by the Sandwich Theorem we get .]
So we deal with an indeterminate limit of type . If we attempt to apply l’Hôpital’s rule, we get , and However, this limit does not exist because (by the Sandwich Theorem), but the limit of does not exist as it widly oscillates between and .
Note that we CANNOT conclude that does not exist. In fact, in this example, DOES exist: In general, if does not exist (and it is not equal to ), l’Hôpital’s rule does not apply.
L’Hópital’s Rule for the Indeterminate Form ±∞/±∞
Theorem 2.(L’Hôpital’s Rule for /): Assume and If then Here signifies , or , where . The theorem remains valid if is replaced by or .
The proof of this theorem is discussed in more advanced books.
Example 14
Find
Solution 14
Because we have
Example 15
Evaluate where .
Solution 15
This is an indeterminate limit of type , and l’Hôpital’s rule applies: because .
The above example shows us that () grows much faster than .
Example 16
Evaluate
Solution 16
Because Figure 2
and we have an indeterminate limit of type and we can apply l’Hôpital’s rule: The second limit is still indeterminate of type . If we directly apply l’Hôpital’s rule to this fraction, because powers of appear in the numerator and expressions involving and in the denominator, we will make the problem more complicated. However, if we first simplify the quotient, l’Hôpital’s rule is then helpful:
Evaluation of the Indeterminate Form 0·(±∞)
We can apply l’Hôpital’s rule to evaluate the limits of the indeterminate form . Namely,
If and or as , then we write so as to cause it to take on one of the forms or , and then apply l’Hôpital’s rule (Theorem 1 or 2).
Example 17
Evaluate
Solution 17
Because and Figure 3. (a) as or as (b) as or as .
That is, we have an indeterminate limit of type or (Figure 4). If we write, we get an indeterminate limit of type :
Figure 4
Now we can apply l’Hôpital’s rule. Therefore, as . The graph of is shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5
Example 18
Evaluate
Solution 18
Note that because we have an indeterminate limit of type (Figure 6).
Figure 6
We can transform this limit into one of the form , and then apply l’Hôpital’s rule: The graph of is shown in Figure 7.
Figure 7
Example 19
Evaluate
Solution 19
Note that and Therefore, and is a limit of the form (see Figure 8).
Figure 8
We can transform it into one of the form . [Recall that as .]
The graph of is shown in Figure 9.
Figure 9
Example 20
Evaluate
Solution 20
Because as , we have an indeterminate limit of type . We write it as Figure 10 shows the graph of .
Figure 10
Evaluation of the Indeterminate Form ∞-∞
To evaluate a limit of the indeterminate form , we can transform it into a limit of a fraction such that we get an indeterminate form of type or , then we apply l’Hôpital’s rule. Some examples of converting a a difference into a fraction are:
Using a common denominator
Rationalization
Factoring out a common factor
or we may write:
Example 21
Evaluate
Solution 21
We notice
and so in both cases, we have an indeterminate limit of type . Using a common denominator, we get
Example 22
Evaluate
Solution 22
Here we have a limit of the form (you may consider and separately). Using a common denominator, we get Now we can apply l’Hôpital’s rule:
Example 23
Evaluate
Solution 23
Here we have a limit of the form (if you consider and separately, you will get ). Using a common denominator, we get Now we can apply l’Hôpital’s rule:
Evaluation of the indeterminate forms
In addition to , , , and , other indeterminate forms are That is, limits of the form
are indeterminate if
and
and or
or and .
To evaluate such limits, let
Taking the natural logarithm of each side, and then exponentiating the results, we obtain Because is a continuous function
In any of the above cases, will take on the indeterminate form .
Note that is not an indeterminate form. If and , then and and And if and , then and
Example 24
Evaluate
Solution 24
Let then As , takes on the form . To find , we write Therefore, So far we have obtained the limit of . To compute the limit of , we use the fact that and and the continuity of the exponential function implies so Figure 11
Example 25
Evaluate
Solution 25
Because as , we have an indeterminate limit of type . Method (a): To find this limit, we can take the natural logorithm of and follow similiar steps of the previous example, Because as , assumes an indeterminate form , and l’H�pital’s rule applies: Therefore,
Method (b): Put . Then as and From the previous example, we know . So
Example 26
Evaluate
Solution 26
This function assumes the indeterminate form . Let and Because and as , we have Figure 12
Example 27
Evaluate
Solution 27
Because and as , we have an indeterminate limit of type . Let thus Because as ,