In this section, we investigate the relationship between the derivative of a function and the derivative of its inverse function.
Let be a one-to-one and differentiable function. Because it is differentiable, its graph does not have any corners or any cusps. Because the graph of is obtained by reflecting the graph of across the line , the graph of does not have any corners or any cusps either. We, therefore, expect that is differentiable wherever the tangent to its graph is not vertical.
Consider a point on the graph of (Figure 1). The equation of the tangent line to the graph of at is
Figure 1
If the graph of and the line are reflected through the diagonal line ,the graph of and the tangent line through are obtained (Figure 2). The equation of is obtained from the equation of by interchanging and ; that is, or which shows that the slope of is . On the other hand, because is the tangent line to the graph of at , the slope of is . Therefore,
Let . Then because , the above equation can be alternatively written as
In general,
for every in the domain of .
Figure 2
Theorem 1. (The Derivative Rule for Inverses): Assume that is a function which is differentiable on the interval such that (or ) for all in Then the inverse function exists, and we have or
In the Leibniz notation, and So the above theorem when expressed in the Leibniz notation becomes Notice that in , the independent variable is , and in , the independent variable is . Additionally notice that if is on the graph of , then must be evaluated at and must be evaluated at , or
Show the proof
Hide the proof
Roughly speaking, because and as , we have
However, for a rigorous mathematical proof we need to include more steps and details.
The above theorem makes two assertions:
the conditions under which the inverse function, , is differentiable;
the formula of .
Show an alternative proof for the above theorem
Hide the alternative proof
If it is known that is differentiable, we can derive the formula of using implicit differentiation in the following way. Let’s start off with Then implicitly differentiate with respect to : The right hand side is one, and for the left hand side we use the chain rule:
Therefore
To show how the above formula works, consider . The inverse function is . Because Then
Thus . Here is the independent variable, but if we wish, we can denote the independent variable, as usual, by . To do so, we can simply replace with on both sides of the equation:
Example 1
Let . Find if it exists.
Solution
The function is a polynomial and hence differentiable everywhere. Also because
its inverse is differentiable everywhere too. It follows from the Derivative Rule for Inverses that To find , we need to solve or We can see that is a solution to this equation. Because has to be one-to-one to have an inverse, must be the only solution. So and to calculate , we just plug into we already obtained. That is, and finally
Example 2
Let for . Find .
Solution
Method 1: Let’s find and then differentiate it. To find , we start off with the equation and solve it for : This equation gives two values of for each , but we have to choose the one with the sign because it is assumed that . Therefore In the equation , is a variable that shows the input. We can denote the input with whatever we want, including . So Now we can easily find : Method 2: Start off with : By the Derivative Rule for inverses, we have
Now we need to express in terms of because in , the independent variable is . From , we solve for :
Because , we set . Therefore
Here simply shows the input of ; we can replace it by and write:
Example 3
Suppose and we know and . Find .
Solution
Let . Thus and using the chain rule, we get
Because the Derivative Rule for Inverses tells us we have and
Because means , we obtain