The graph of this function is illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Graph of
Note that is not defined at (division by zero is undefined), but let\textquoteright s consider the values of when is close to . Letting approach from both sides, the corresponding values of are given in the following table.
From this table, we see that as gets closer and closer to but never quite equal to , becomes indefinitely large; in other words, we can make as large as we desire if we take close enough to .
To express that increases without bound as approaches , we write
Instead of , we may simply write .
The equals sign does not mean that the limit exists. Note that is not a number; it is just a symbol for indicating that indefinitely increases.
Description 1: Let be a function defined on both sides of , except possibly at itself. If we can make as large as we wish by taking sufficiently close to but not equal to , then we say approaches as approaches (or the limit of , as approaches , is positive infinity and write
Show the Precise Definition of limx→af(x)=+∞
Hide the Precise Definition
The precise definition is as follows
Definition 1: Let be a function defined in some deleted neighborhood of (that is, is defined for all on both sides of except possibly at the number itself). We say approaches infinity as approaches and write
if for every positive real number , there exists a such that
This says if for any real number that you give me, I can determine a such that for any closer to than (except when ), is above the line . A geometric illustration is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: means given any horizontal line , we can determine a such that lies above the line for all closer to than (but with ).
limx→af(x)=-∞
Now consider the function defined by the equation
The graph of is shown in Figure 3. We notice that and as approaches from either side, decreases without bound. In this case we write
Figure 3: Graph of
Description 2: Let be a function defined on both sides of , except possibly at itself. If we can make as large negative as we wish by taking sufficiently close to but not equal to , then we say approaches as approaches (or the limit of is as approaches is infinity and write
Show the Precise Definition of limx→af(x)=-∞
Hide the Precise Definition
The precise definition is as follows.
Definition 2: Let be a function defined in some deleted neighborhood of (that is, is defined for all in some open interval containing except possibly at the number itself). We say approaches minus infinity as approaches and write
if for every negative real number , there exists a such that
One-Sided “Infinite” Limits
One-sided limits can be also defined accordingly. For example, consider the function defined by the equation
Here we can assign all values to except as the denominator becomes zero when . If , is negative and if , is positive. The graph of this function is represented in Figure 4.
As approaches from the left (through the values that are less than ), is negative and decreases without bound; while as approaches from right (through values that are larger than ), increases without bound. In this case, we write
Figure 4: Graph of . As we can see here and .
Example 1
Use the precise definition to prove that
Solution
Suppose is given. We must show that there is a such that
Because and when [Recall that means is approaching through values greater than ], we have
Let’s look at the graph of (Figure 6); we realize that
But because is not defined for , we cannot talk about (and hence neither the two-sided limit ).
Figure 6: Graph of . It is clear from this graph that
In general,
See Figure 7.
Figure 7: Graph of . If , then and if ,
Algebraic operations
Theorem 1: Let and be real numbers. If and then
The theorem is also valid for the left and right-hand limits; that is, if we replace by or .
In the above theorem, we talk about the sign of for all close to (not in its entire domain); it does not matter if the sign of changes when is not very close to .
We may summarize the above theorem and symbolically write
Depending on the sign of and the sign of for close to , x. Recall
Q: We have been always told that division by zero is not defined but here we simply write is plus or minus infinity. What’s going on?
A: This is just a symbol for memorizing the above theorem. Also, here the denominator is not exactly zero! The denominator gets closer and closer to as gets closer and closer to , but not equal to . If for all close to , then the function will not be defined near and so we cannot talk about the limit of when approaches .
Show the Proof of Theorem 1
Hide the Proof
We only prove the first case as the proofs of the other cases are similar. To prove that
when and for all close to , we need to show that for every number (no matter how large is), there exists a such that for all
From statements (i) and (iii), we conclude that for every , there exists a and a such that for all
Hence, if and , then for all if , then which is what we were trying to prove.
It follows from the above theorem that
These limits are also clear from the graph of (see the following figures).
(a) is odd. and .
(b) is even.
Figure 8
Because ,
and when , we have
and because when , we have
These results are also clear from the graph of . As we can see from Figure 9:
Figure 9: In general and for .
Similarly, because , as approaches a zero of cosine from one side, the secant goes to plus infinity or minus infinity (See Figure 10).
Figure 10: As approaches where the cosine function is zero (from one side), the secant function goes to or . The zeros of cosine occur at .
Example 2
Find
(a)
(b)
Solution
(a) The limit of the numerator is
and the limit of the denominator is 0
So by Theorem 1, we know the result can be or depending on the sign of numerator (which is negative ) and the sign of the denominator (which we need to find) as .
To determine the sign of the denominator, we construct a sign table:
so there are two roots and
From the above table, we see that the denominator is negative as approaches from the left. Because the limit of the numerator is , we obtain
“Symbolically” we may write
As in part (a), the limit of the numerator is and the limit of the denominator is but from the above sign table we see that the denominator is approaching zero through positive values. Therefore
“Symbolically” we may write
The graph of is illustrated in the following figure.
Figure 11: Graph of .
Example 3
Find
(a)
(b)
where is the greatest integer function (also called the floor function). The other notation for is .
Solution
(a) When , . Therefore and hence . Furthermore, and is approaching 0 through negative numbers
(b) When , . Therefore as is close to 2 but larger than 2, is exactly zero but is a small quantity close to zero. If we divide the number zero by any small number (not equal to zero), we get exactly zero. To understand this reasoning better, consider the following table.
The graph of is shown below.
Figure 12: Graph of . From this graph we can see that and .
Example 4
Find
(a)
(b)
Solution
(a) Substituting into the given expression results in the indeterminate form . As approaches 3 through values greater than 3, . Therefore, we can write [Recall that . Here but . So ]. Also [Recall ]. Because here and , we have Therefore By direct substitution, the limit of the numerator is and the limit of the denominator is 0. The denominator approaches zero through positive numbers [the square root is always positive]. Therefore by Theorem 1, The graph of is shown in Figure 12.
Figure 13:Graph of .
(b) Similar to part (a), direct subsitution yields the indeterminate form 0/0. As , . Thus or Therefore By direct subsitution the limit of the numerator is , and the limit of the denomiator is zero. The denominator approaches zero through negative values. Therefore, by Theorem 1 The graph of is shown in Figure 13.
Figure 14: Graph of .
Because and are not numbers, the Limit Laws do not apply for infinite limits. If we have infinite limits we can use the following theorem instead.
Theorem 2: (a) If and , then and (b) If and , then and (c) If and , then and (d) If and , then and
The theorem is valid if we replace by or .
We may summarize the above theorem and say
(1) (2)
(3) (4)
For example, because and , it follows from the above theorem that and
Indeterminate Forms 0·∞ and ∞ – ∞
Note that Theorem 2 does not say anything about or : In fact, we say the cases and are “indeterminate limits.” Let’s look at them this way: We know So this implies that can be any number , and we need to evaluate each limit case by case. On the other hand because we may conclude that can have any value.
Examples showing that an indeterminate limit may take any value
Hide the examples
Note , and , but Also , and , but and
Because limits of the form or may take any value that we cannot predict in advance, we call them indeterminate.
Because or , you may think that . Although is just a symbol and hence does not imply , the following theorem tells us this conclusion is valid.
Theorem 3: If and or then
Symbolically we may express the above theorem as
Any number divided by a very large (positive or negative) number becomes approximately zero. For example, 2 divided by 1,000,000 is and 7 divided by is .
Note that is not a number, and is just a symbol to memorize the above theorem. Also the following expression helps us remember the two above theorems.
On the left expression, must be nonzero because is an indeterminate form (see Section [sec:Ch4-Indeterminate-0/0]) but on the right expression can be zero. Limits of the form are not indeterminate; roughly speaking
On the right, we may replace with or and the result is still value, because roughly speacking is or , and infinity multiplied by infinity is infinity. On the other hand, on the right hand side, we cannot replace with infinity.
Indeterminate Form ∞ / ∞
Theorem 3does not tell us anything about . This is another indeterminate form In fact, we saw so can be any number .
We will learn how to deal with limits of the indeterminate forms , and in Section 4.10. Finding limits of the indeterminate form was discussed in Section 4.5.
Example 5
Find
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Solution
(a) Recall the graph of (Figure [6]). Now if we shift it 2 units to the right, we obtain the graph of . As approaches 2 through values greater than 2 , is large and negative. That is, The function or is a polynomial and thus we can simply substitute 2 for in its expression However, when is greater than , approaches 0 through negative values Therefore Finally The graph of is shown in Figure 15.
Figure 15
(b) Because is not defined for , cannot approach 2 through values less than 2 and the left-hand limit does not exist.
(c) In part of (a), we saw where By Theorem 3, The graph of is shown in Figure 16. As we can in this figure, the function approaches 0 as .
You may wonder why the function approaches , as approaches to 3 from the left, and the function approaches as approaches to 3 from the right. The reason is that the denominator is zero at , , and is negative when is less than 3 (for example if , Thus by Theorem 1 A similar argument, shows us that
Figure 16
(d) Again because is not defined for , the left-hand limit does not exist.